http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/12/grow-green-jobs/
Nancy Folbre, who is an economics professor at the University of Massachusetts, had a post this month on "Economix" about growing green jobs. Her point was that a way to deal with "sagging payrolls and global warming" simultaneously is to grow green jobs. She is quick to point out that there is a conservative backlash against the promotion of green jobs which is linked to skepticism about the threat of global warming. And certainly we would be a part of that "backlash". (See our year end 2009 post.)
But, who wouldn't want a cleaner planet with less pollution? So, Folbre has some thoughts that we like. She's leaned on a very thorough study by "The Pew Charitable Trusts" (Pew Finds Clean Energy Economy Generates Significant Job Growth - 6/09). The Pew Study estimated that green jobs grew nearly two and a half times faster than overall jobs between 1998 and 2007.
Frankly, we think the Pew Study performed a service in the sense that it produced a clear definition of the "clean energy" economy and conducted the first-ever hard count across all 50 states of actual jobs, companies and venture capital investments that supply the growing market for environmentally friendly products and services.
Pew found that clean energy jobs grew at a national rate of 9.1%, while traditional jobs grew at 3.7% during that 1998 thru 2007 period mentioned above. Certainly, that has potential.
Pew's definition of a clean energy economy comprises 5 categories: (1) Clean Energy, (2) Energy Efficiency, (3) Environmentally Friendly Production, (4) Conservation and Pollution Mitigation, and (5) Training and Support. This definitional framework provides a useful perspective for tracking jobs, investments and economic growth over time which, in turn, facilitates evaluating the effectiveness of policy choices and investments. Included in Pew's definition are jobs as diverse as engineers, plumbers, administrative assistants, construction workers, teachers and several others.
Venture capital investment in clean technology crossed the $1 billion threshold in 2005 and grew to $12.6 billion by the end of 2008.
Making investments in this area part of public infrastructure projects with a combination of public (federal loan guarantees) and private financing would certainly help cash-strapped state and local governments to improve energy efficiency at the ground floor while creating much needed jobs and tax revenue streams. But wait, that's a good idea so it's probably not politically palatable.
Of course, as Nancy Folbre points out, there's no need to spend money to create jobs or save energy if you think the market will take care of these problems on its own: "Likewise, you don't need to water your own garden if you're confident the rain will always come on time."
We like Nancy's perspective.
Friday, July 16, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A related chart:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.eli.org/pdf/Energy_Subsidies_Black_Not_Green.pdf
We're really nudging the wrong way on this issue, by my estimation.
Craig: I'm not sure what you mean. My perspective is really an employment-oriented one. Hiring unemployed auto workers in the great lakes region to build spars for wind energy farms maximizes a labor opportunity, a geographic advantage (Great Lakes and Texas are the two best sources of wind energy), and pushes a green energy initiative. If we can "go green" and improve employment simultaneously, that works.
ReplyDeleteOh I don't disagree in the slightest. All my chart really shows is that for every incentive we had put into renewables, we were putting almost three times as many into oldschool fossil fuels.
ReplyDeleteI'd be interested to see that chart updated. My point is I agree with you, and I don't believe we're doing enough to spur growth in those areas. Our market share of the solar industry for example, has been decimated by the Chinese.
Heck the batteries being used in the new Chevy Volt are being built by LG in South Korea, we just 'assemble' them here.
We're far behind the ball in this race. Imagine where we could be if we'd started serious investment a decade ago.
Craig: You're right. While we couldn't get our act together on green investments, China (and other Asian countries) gained on the market and we're playing catch up. That is partly a government policy issue and partly a very poor green venture cap industry growth situation.
ReplyDelete