http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/2cb543cc-595b-11df-99ba-00144feab49a.html
It's good to know that Gillian Tett (Financial Times' US managing editor) is keeping up with "Dr. Doom" doing a breakfast interview at the trendy Soho Grand Hotel in Tribeca, New York. Surrounded by beautiful people in the expensive and expansive lobby, one can get a double espresso for $8, a granola for 9$ and a "frittata" for $16.
But Tett reminds us that Nouriel Roubini is not your average egg head. He was practically alone in 2006 when he gave a big speech to the IMF warning that the "United States was likely to face a once-in-a-lifetime housing bust, an oil shock, sharply declining consumer confidence and ultimately a deep recession", along with "homeowners defaulting on mortgages, trillions of dollars of mortgage-backed securities unraveling worldwide and the global financial system grinding to a halt." As Tett puts it, "It was a bold call; so much so that many policymakers and economists thought Roubini was slightly mad."
But, in 2007, when the financial crisis exploded, the world realized that Roubini had called it. Again Tett: "Today policymakers around the world hang on his words, journalists flock to his speeches to hear his latest predictions and clients pay big money to receive analysis from his consultancy company, Roubini Global Economics." His influence has stretched far beyond the business world to Hollywood where he appears briefly as himself in the new Oliver Stone movie "Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps" which is the sequel to the original "Wall Street."
Even at the start of 2007, when Roubini attended the World Economic Forum in Davos to make the same prophesies he had espoused in the fall of 2006, his views were widely dismissed (again!). Of course, there are many of us who wonder what gets done at Davos (aside from "being seen") anyway. At that time, Roubini recalls, Micheal Lewis (whose current book, "The Big Short", is now the #1 non-fiction best seller), wrote an article which labeled "... Cassandras such as Roubini as 'wimps' and 'ninnies'." Now, Lewis has written a book which chronicles what Roubini had predicted.
For Roubini, the summer of 2006 was critical: the housing market had peaked and that was his idea of the immediate trigger for impending "doom."
His perspective today is that Greece reflects a bigger problem facing the western world: governments appear to lack the stomach to tackle spiraling government debt. Today, he sees himself as a "centrist" on economic issues since he believes that governments need to spend money in a crisis to support the system, in line with Keynesian economic ideals - but he believes that when a crisis is over, they should revert to free-market approaches, reflecting the so-called "Austrian School" of economics. He thus sees himself as "pragmatic and eclectic."
With all of this, Roubini is hoping to evolve from"Dr. Doom" to "Dr. Realist." He's tired of the one title and feels deserving of the other. We agree.
With her article, Tett goes on to do the reader a service by connecting, as many of us have, Roubini to Nassim Nicholas Taleb, who, in 2007, published an attention grabbing book, "The Black Swan", in which he urged investors to prepare for events so rare that they were unimaginable in advance. These so-called "black swans" could, he predicted, take markets completely by surprise.
For Nouriel Roubini, however, the concept of a "black swan" is not helpful in looking at the current credit crunch. Instead, he prefers to describe the dramas of the past few years as a set of "white swans", in the sense that they are following a pattern that is not that rare, since it has already been played out numerous times across the world recently. Roubini feels that emerging market countries have had these kinds of economic shocks recently and that they were just precursors of the big worldwide one: "... western governments have become so debt-laden that their fiscal fundamentals look worse than many non-western nations." He adds that the debt to GDP ratios of the BRIC countries are substantially similar to, or even less than what countries like the UK and US are evolving to: roughly 100%, or more (Brazil 57%, Russia 6%, India 85%, China 22%). Western countries are now "piling on" debt amid sluggish growth.
Overall, Tett presents the new "Rock Star Roubini" as more balanced in his views than many in his profession had heretofore seen. In that sense, as well as in an economic sense, her article is an "education".
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
For those who are interested in what Roubini has to say on an ongoing basis, the following is the link to his blog.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.project-syndicate.org/
Then click on his name under the contents listings, "Thought Leaders"
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/21693/20100430/gold-silver-currencies-hyperinflation-oil-social-security-medicare-money-supply-recession.htm
ReplyDeleteWhat do you think about this?
Josh: Thank you for forwarding...what I think is that that is a very long address...if you want to give me the gist of it as a "comment", I'll be happy to respond!
ReplyDeleteBasically, hyperinflation is coming and government statistics are inaccurate. Something like the Fed will try to keep rates low to make money cheap, but will result in more inflation. There is tons of little details, but that is the gist. Of course, gold and other such metals will spike up in the short term.
ReplyDeleteI have no idea how this will go, but debt has been rising crazily since the 1980s. Debt can be highly effective if used properly, but spending cuts are going to happen along with tax increases.
Unemployment could reset to a new normal, like 10% unemployment (the most understated version). Stiglitz recommended more than a year ago (I think) to create a portfolio of public projects that can be initiated across the U.S. as need to influence unemployment. This makes sense when considering decaying public infrastructure.
Track inventories, manufacturing, consumer spending, retail sale, and real estate values. I do not know if prices or quantities of buildings are where they should be, but maybe you will get bored.
Roubini should be on CSPAN pretty soon. He did a little 9 minute thing for his new book. He is asserting that recessions are predictable and avoidable, which makes sense. The recession was certainly not a black swan. However, black swans are more likely to arise out of this complexity:
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/guest/25184/
When the data is available but managers do not look at it. That is called ignorance. The Dow dropping over 1000 in one day is more like a black swan...
Soho Grand Hotel is messed up. I can never understand why people are so obsessed with such riches. I would rather spend millions on lobbying Congress to double the research budget. Meh, no more respect for Roubini. Stiglitz at least smiles. His interview for his book on CSPAN was actually nice informative television. Roubini looks like he is about to leap of his chair and punch you in the face sometimes, which is funny. Maybe he feels rejected by society and scorned by his peers. I can see a "Darth Roubini" that plots his revenge on society by influencing people to facilitate a double dip recession. Hahaha... whatever. His character seems like the classic nice guy turned into super bad guy.
Whatever. This is all of course far more complex than what I talk about. Have a nice summer everyone. The remainder is blah.
Duh! America is not Greece. That sounds like politics, not economics. It is more complex than GDP ratios, and politics is more complex than that too. However, the government system is not sustainable. Krugman either lies or thinks we should just be stoked about hyperinflation. Budget problem? Just inflate the @!#$ out of money, like the Germans. Maybe we should start another war... with Iran. Pentagon thinks 2015 sounds good... right after America pulls out of Iraq and Afghanistan? Hahahaha. The strategy is questionable their too. Iran will be a mess and just anger the world more. Hurray! Only problem? Wars are not effective and jump starting an economy. WW2 worked out well, but not as cost efficiently as possible. There will come a point when America cannot take on more loans. I am not sure when or at what amount that is, but the Obama Administration has acknowledged the current system is unsustainable in addition to research firms tracking the budget. I have no idea about the job situation besides it being grim.
Josh: Great points all. You did a good job of summarizing the article you forwarded to us - it reminded me of the Eisenhower exercise. If there is a "new normal" for unemployment (which is a reasonable arguement), there is little hope for a sustainable economic recovery. Stiglitz is right about the portfolio of public projects, and, if Meredith Whitney is correct, something like that needs to be done to stem the tide of coming layoffs in state level government, which will do nothing but make the unemployment numbers look worse. Small business job growth is the key.
ReplyDelete